Something that was mentioned right at the end of class during our discussion of Web 2.0 really struck a chord with me. Instead of the teacher standing in front of the classroom and lecturing, we are now presented with all of this new technology. Is this really a good thing though? If we don’t know what to do with it, it can be a very dangerous prospect i feel.
Though I rarely knew a student who actually read the ENTIRE textbook (even what wasn’t required), textbooks have an ending. They have restrictions as to what you are learning. For a child to be able to explore whatever most interests them about a topic is great. Then again, it can be dangerous. Say for example, in a high school or middle school class the students are told to research a particular person in history. After writing a paper, the students will include their resources on where they retrieved this information. The information that the child is learning could be completely false. Unless the information they are writing is completely obvious (like the lice/holocaust situation) the teacher will most likely have no clue. Her students could be walking away from class with a bunch of incorrect information. Don’t get me wrong, I am all for integrating technology into the classroom. But until we can figure out a safe way of controlling what our students are researching (possibly giving them certain sites that they are restricted to when doing research that we know contain true facts) then I think the Internet shouldn’t be used as a research tool. If we continue to use the Internet as our only source of reading/researching, what will happen to the thousands of books in the library? Why would we even need a library; why not just have a room filled with computers and call it the Research Lab…? Books may be restricting, but is it better to be restricted to accurate information or given an unlimited source of questionable facts?